Texans Seek Justice Against Dr. Fauci, Medical Establishment
The Vires Law Group together with the Chris Byrd Law firm, and with the support of the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation announce the submission of requests to the District Attorneys of twenty-two Texas counties to initiate criminal investigations of Dr. Anthony Fauci and other officials for alleged crimes committed against citizens of Texas prior to and during the COVID-19 pandemic. The criminal referral requests are being submitted to the District Attorneys for Angelina, Bexar, Brazos, Collin, Cooke, Dallas, Fort Bend, Galveston, Guadalupe, Grayson, Gregg, Harris, Hays, Johnson, Lubbock, Montgomery, Smith, Tarrant, Tom Green, Travis, and Wise counties. This effort to investigate Dr. Fauci and other accused persons is supported by donations from individuals and organizations such as the Fight Like A Flynn PAC run by former National Security Advisor retired Lieutenant General Mike Flynn.
The requests made by attorneys Rodriguez, Miller, and Byrd ask the District Attorneys to make criminal referrals to Attorney General Ken Paxton for investigation and charges, on behalf of the next-of-kin relatives of 46 victims in Texas who have sought their assistance in requesting investigation into the deaths of their loved ones under COVID hospital protocols, intentional COVID-19 infection mismanagement, and suppression and denial of life-saving treatments in Texas hospitals, nursing homes, and other facilities.
The criminal referrals accuse Dr. Fauci, current and former federal officers, and hospital systems providing care within Texas of committing crimes per Texas penal code, including:
∙Capital Murder – Tex. Penal Code §19.03(a)(7) ∙Murder – Tex. Penal Code §19.02(b)
∙Manslaughter – Tex. Penal Code §19.04
∙Trafficking of Persons – Tex. Penal Code §20A.02
∙Participation in enterprise through racketeering or unlawful debt collection – Tex. Penal Code §72.04 by Engaging in Organized Criminal Activity – Tex. Penal Code §71.02
∙Injury to a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual – Tex. Penal Code §22.04
∙Abandoning or endangering a child, elderly individual, or disabled individual – Tex. Penal Code §22.041(c)
∙Unlawful Restraint – Tex. Penal Code §20.02.
In addition to Anthony Fauci, the following individuals and officers are Subjects of the requested investigation:
-Cliff Lane, Deputy Director, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
-Francis Collins, ex-Director, National Institutes of Health
-Deborah Birx, ex-White House COVID Response Coordinator & former Director of DOD HIV Research at Walter Reed Army Institute of Research
-Rochelle Walensky, ex-Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
-Stephen Hahn, ex-Commissioner, Federal Drug Administration
-Robert Redfield, ex-Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
-Peter Daszak, President, Eco-Health Alliance
-Rick Bright, Director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority
-The Administrators and Healthcare Providers of hospital systems and facilities providing care to patients in Texas, including but not limited to Baylor, Scott, & White Hospital System (“BSW”)
The attorneys who extensively researched and compiled the criminal referrals, along with many other concerned citizens, believe that it is essential that the Texas Attorney General and his staff conduct a thorough investigation to determine if the evidence contained in the filing together with further evidence to be uncovered through investigation substantiates indictment and prosecution of the identified suspects for the alleged crimes. If the evidence provides probable cause that crimes have been committed, then it is expected that the State of Texas will prosecute them to the fullest extent of the law. The submission details how the Subjects in their respective roles, caused harm who were either state actors who provided the impetus for private conduct or were private parties who acted as proxies for state actors in conduct that would be unconstitutional if done directly by the state. In either case, the bad acts were criminal and violative of the U.S. Const. amend. XIV and Tex. Const. Art. 1, § 19.
Calls for accountability are coming from all over the nation and even the halls of Congress, as recently expressed by Senator Ron Johnson and Congressman Chip Roy. Based on the current legal landscape, if these culpable federal officers, former officials, and hospital systems are ever to be held accountable and punished for their COVID-related crimes, such justice must be delivered by a state or county level criminal process. These victim stories have been documented by the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation’s COVID-19 Humanity Betrayal Memory Project and can be found on chbmp.org.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is a 501(c)3 nonprofit founded by Attorney Brad Geyer, a former federal prosecutor of 21 years. After leaving government in 2012 because of the corruption he witnessed, he formed the foundation in 2016. Initially the foundation was engaged in humanitarian projects around the world but then changed its focus exclusively to crimes against humanity regarding the COVID-19 response. The foundation’s national volunteer Citizen Task Force is largely comprised of survivors, widows, and next of kin of the deadly COVID-19 hospital protocol. It is involved in many aspects of seeking justice for its members and offering services such as daily support meetings, helping with attorney acquisition, obtaining, and understanding medical records, organizing events to raise awareness in the public square, and connecting victims and survivors in their respective states.
We urge the People of Texas to stand with these victims and their families and support the District Attorneys and Attorney General Paxton in bringing to light the truth of the victims’ suffering and deaths and the suffering of their families, and in securing justice for these victims of these egregious crimes. © 2024, FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation 501(c)3
FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation, 501c3 (FormerFeds.org), Supports Legal Action for Financial Freedom
Carolyn Blakeman and members of the 501c3 FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation (FormerFeds.Org) are delighted to announce a significant stride in our ongoing mission to uphold freedom and liberty.
Unveiling Our Latest Legal Action
In collaboration with Bradford L. Geyer of FormerFedsGroup.Com, we proudly endorse his law firm’s initiative against the U.S. Department of Justice. Geyer, representing thousands of Himalaya Exchange customers, is contesting the unjust confiscation of $300 million in customer funds and $136 million in investment gains. This aligns with our organization’s commitment to compelling the U.S. Government to respect our common humanity, resisting Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs), and highlighting the broader implications of digital control.
This action follows our engagement of Thomas Renz to file a Supreme Court Amicus brief on a writ of cert petition in Edward Lang v. US and our support of the Gilead Suit.
Additionally, our organizations have supported FormerFedsGroup.Com in referring out 100 hospital homicide cases.
A Case Emblematic of Our Struggle
The arbitrary seizures against a stable coin crypto exchange underscore our concerns about the U.S. Government’s practice of targeting legal conduct by advocates for freedom. Blakeman remarks, “What used to be encouraged is increasingly treated as suspicious and aberrational conduct.” Start-up crypto exchanges face heightened enforcement, likely tied to the U.S. Government’s plans for a centralized CBDC system, endangering cash, hard currencies, and independent crypto exchanges.
Our diverse members, spanning various backgrounds and professions, have faced unwarranted targeting in medical treatments and gene therapies, breaching Constitutional Law. Government protocols, perverse incentives, and selective law enforcement have led to the torture and death of loved ones in hospitals. The shift toward trackable CBDCs jeopardizes economic freedom, signaling a worrisome move towards centralized financial control, intensifying the current dismal situation.
The Impact on Our Members
Government actions have not only resulted in substantial financial losses for non-American Himalaya Exchange customers with limited recourse but have also caused profound psychological distress. Our members share a common experience of feeling betrayed and harshly treated by the government, encountering closed doors when seeking help. We empathize with Himalaya Exchange customers striving to maximize economic freedom through exchanges and advocate for their protection.
Join Us in This Important Battle
This press conference marks a pivotal moment in our fight against digital enslavement and CBDC overreach. Together, we enter a new chapter in the struggle for financial freedom and individual rights against unwarranted government control.
We invite you to stand with us in this critical fight for the preservation of fundamental freedoms in an increasingly digital world.
Warm regards,
FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation
FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation Files Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners Lang, Fischer, and Miller in Landmark 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) Case
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation, a 501c3 nonprofit organization staffed primarily by volunteers affected by medical treatment protocols and MRNA vaccines, announced today its appreciation to Thomas Renz, Esq. Renz Law, LLC Post Office Box 201 St. Louis, Missouri 63025 Telephone: 419-351-4248 (renzlawllc@gmail.com) who filed today an amicus curiae brief in the case of Petitioner Principal Edward Lang and his co-petitioners Joseph W. Fischer and Garrett Miller. These individuals are facing charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) in a case that has garnered significant attention for its potential impact on the interpretation of this federal statute.
In an unusual legal posture, the United States filed an interlocutory appeal from the District Court’s dismissal of charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), prompting Lang, Fischer, and Miller to gain standing even before their trial begins. The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation has chosen to support these petitioners by filing an amicus curiae brief, which has not been opposed by the principal parties in the case.
The key issue at stake in this case is the interpretation of the term “corruptly” as used in 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation Files Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners Lang, Fischer, and Miller in Landmark 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) Case [St. Louis, Missouri, September 29, 2023] 2). This statute encompasses actions that allegedly obstruct, influence, or impede official proceedings, and yet it lacks a statutory definition for the crucial term “corruptly.” The amicus curiae brief argues that the failure to define “corruptly” leaves individuals unsure about what conduct may provoke the U.S. Department of Justice’s ire, potentially chilling the exercise of free speech and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation contends that the lack of clarity in the statute and the potential broad application of “corruptly” raises significant First Amendment concerns. The amicus curiae brief highlights the need for the Supreme Court to address the meaning of “corruptly” to ensure that individuals engaging in free expression and peaceful civil disobedience are not unjustly prosecuted. The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation’s amicus curiae brief provides valuable insights into the legal and constitutional questions surrounding 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). By filing this brief, the Foundation aims to assist the Court in its analysis of this important case and the proper interpretation of the statute.
Thomas Renz, Esq., of Renz Law, LLC, has consistently demonstrated an unwavering commitment to the principles of justice, transparency, and the protection of civil liberties. His dedication to pursuing truth and advocating for those who may feel voiceless in the legal system is commendable. In this case, as with many others, Mr. Renz’s meticulous attention to detail, deep understanding of legal intricacies, and impassioned representation highlight his esteemed position in the legal community. The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is profoundly grateful for his invaluable contributions and tireless efforts, reflecting his reputation as a beacon of integrity and legal excellence.
As Mr. Renz states:
Amici are baffled by when, how, and for what they might be prosecuted under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). The only guiding principle appears to be whether a protestor agrees with government messages. The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is an IRS Code Section 501(c)(3) organization that is staffed primarily by hundreds of volunteer widows and relatives of victims of hospital treatment protocols and MRNA vaccines for COVID-19 that in many instances were coerced or administered without “informed consent.” The Foundation and members intend to influence official proceedings and may engage in actions that some could twist into obstructing or impeding, in order to stop falsehoods that they are convinced led to the death of their loved ones. There are thousands of organizations — including Amici here — who “influence” official proceedings. Some are paid lobbyists, others motivated by a cause.
The Foundation’s brief also underscores the inconsistency in the application of the statute, noting that while individuals engaged in peaceful protests and activism may face charges under 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2), other instances of obstruction during events such as the 2020 White House siege have not led to similar prosecutions. For more information about the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation and its involvement in this case, please contact Carolyn Blakeman at Carolyn.Blakeman@FormerFedsGroup.Org or visit chbmp.org.
Anyone wishing to support the Foundation’s continuing work can make donations at FormerFeds.Org.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is an IRS Code Section 501(c)(3) organization staffed primarily by volunteers affected by medical treatment protocols and MRNA vaccines. Committed to advocating for justice and the protection of civil liberties, the Foundation aims to influence official proceedings and engage in actions aimed at addressing concerns that have led to the loss of loved ones. Learn more about the Foundation at FormerFedsGroup.Org.
Class Action Complaint Filed Against Gilead Sciences, Inc. Over Remdesivir Alleges False Advertising And Negligence
The undersigned counsel have chosen to file this suit in response to compelling, continuous appeals from members of the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation. FormerFedsGroup.Org is a recognized IRS Code Section 501(c)(3) organization, primarily staffed by hundreds of volunteer widows, widowers, and relatives who have tragically lost loved ones due to hospital treatment protocols and mRNA vaccines for COVID-19. In many distressing instances, these treatments were administered without the necessary informed consent.
To date, the Foundation has diligently compiled over a thousand eyewitness testimonies of hospital mistreatment and vaccine-related injuries, with many unfortunately culminating in fatalities. These testimonies can be accessed at formerfedsgroup.org/
The journey of many within the FFFF has been marred by emotional strife. Their genuine efforts to raise awareness and prevent further tragedies have been met with resistance and suppression.
Complaint Overview: The plaintiffs, alleging violations under the California Code of Civil Procedure § 382, accuse Gilead Sciences, Inc. of promoting Remdesivir’s safety and efficacy without revealing its potential risks.
Jurisdiction:
Parties: Plaintiffs, spanning various regions, claim injuries or deaths due to Remdesivir administration during hospitalization for COVID-19. Notably, plaintiffs include Deborah Fust and Edward Pimentel, who both allege harm from the drug.
Gilead Sciences, Inc. is a Delaware-based corporation.
Class Allegations:
Statement of Facts: The complaint delves into Remdesivir’s development and marketing, underscoring potential undisclosed risks. The plaintiffs contend that Gilead painted a rosier picture of Remdesivir than warranted by available data.
Conclusion: This class-action seeks accountability from Gilead Sciences, Inc. for alleged deceptive practices concerning Remdesivir.
The plaintiffs are represented by a syndicate of attorneys who have joined together at the urging of thousands of widows and next of kin of Americans who believe they or their loved ones suffered injury or death from Remdesivir.
Our counsels’ dedication to this cause is not just a legal commitment but a moral obligation. Almost every day, in our regular support groups, we are approached by hundreds of victims who share heart-wrenching stories, pleading for justice and seeking accountability. Their voices, combined with the meticulous documentation and the overwhelming weight of eyewitness accounts, fortify our resolve. We are here not just as legal representatives, but as the collective voice of those who feel unheard and marginalized. It is our sincere hope that all parties, including Gilead Sciences, Inc., recognize the depth and gravity of the concerns raised and approach this matter with the respect and seriousness it warrants. Our aim is to seek truth and justice, and we are steadfastly committed to that pursuit, fortified by the strength of the community we represent.
FFFF’s initiatives span across multiple fronts. In collaboration with attorneys Stanford Graham and Warner Mendenhall, and other Change Makers, the Foundation is deeply involved in various legal endeavors addressing the aftermath of the pandemic. One such initiative, We The People 50, is a concerted effort to recall the COVID vaccines, leveraging state-level consumer protection statutes. Furthermore, the Foundation has assembled a National Citizen Task Force, a dedicated group of hundreds of witnesses to COVID-related crimes against humanity nationwide, dedicated to pursuing accountability for COVID-19- related harms, associated systemic abuses, and to advocate for the affected. Their extensive reach and operations, from media engagements to grassroots mobilizations, have made them a formidable voice in the ongoing discourse.
To everyone involved, this isn’t just about a class-action against Gilead Sciences, Inc., acknowledging the voices of countless victims, and ensuring they are heard, respected, and acted upon. It is about exposing injustice, educating the public and putting a stop to any further injuries and deaths. The plaintiffs’ representation, backed by the robust community of FFFF, its Citizen Task Force, and the many victims who are relying on FFFF to make their voices heard, remains unwavering in its commitment to seek truth, justice, and accountability.
For further information about the case or for media inquiries, please contact Carolyn Blakeman at FDADeathProtocol@
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation (FFFF) is a New Jersey based 501(c)(3) organization comprised of former federal agents, prosecutors, lawyers, medical professionals, researchers, and volunteers from around the United States and all over the world. Our mission is to preserve, protect, and, where needed, restore our constitutional rights and God-given unalienable freedoms. If you would like to help support this mission, please make a contribution or volunteer today. If you have any questions, please contact us.
Blood Money Episode 76 with Former Feds Brad Geyer + CC Blakeman
The video on Rumble features a discussion between former federal agents Brad Geyer and CC Blakeman about how the federal government profits from drug trafficking. They claim that the government turns a blind eye to drug trafficking by certain groups, such as the Sinaloa Cartel, in exchange for information and cooperation with other criminal investigations. Geyer and Blakeman argue that this practice not only allows drug trafficking to continue but also contributes to violence and other criminal activities. The video provides examples and anecdotes to support these claims, but it is important to note that they are the opinions of the speakers and are not necessarily representative of the official views or policies of the federal government.
New Addition To The FFFF Team
Houston, Texas – The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation (the “FFFF”, a 501c3 corporation) is pleased to announce that, as of March 24, 2020, Jennifer Bridges, R.N., has joined our team as a Director and Medical Consultant.
Ms. Bridges brings to the FFFF over nine years of medical experience, the last two years spent on the very front lines of the COVID-19 pandemic. She is the founder of Guardians of Medical Choice (https://guardiansofmedicalchoice.com) and is a nationally solicited medical freedom conference speaker. She was employed with Houston Methodist Hospital until she refused to comply with its mandated COVID-19 vaccination directive. Rather than meekly submit to Houston Methodist Hospital’s mandate, Jennifer bravely commenced litigation against the same in both federal and state courts. One of her lawsuits is presently poised for the consideration of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals (https://guardiansofmedicalchoice.com/lawsuit-updates/).
As Ms. Bridges explains, “It broke my heart to leave my colleagues and the hospital I love, but I felt obligated and driven by my morals and ethical principles! I just couldn’t stand by and watch everyone getting bullied! No one should ever be forced to do something like this against their will! I simply had to stand up and fight back!”
our Legal Team, General Counsel of the FFFF, states, “The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation looks forward to utilizing Jennifer’s experience and passion in the service of our multinational and multidisciplinary alliance against the mandates and other pandemic abuses.”
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is pursuing a broad range of creative initiatives to combat pandemic crimes and abuses globally (https://formerfedsgroup.org).
For example, The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation supports a broad spectrum of leading independent, multidisciplinary initiatives which oppose 1) mandated Emergency Use Authorizations that indemnify acts and omissions constituting unethical and illegal medical experimentation and 2)improperly obtained or waived informed consent to such medical experimentation.
The Director of the FFFF notes “The results of our preliminary investigation demonstrate that high-level public health agency leadership failed to disclose material aspects of the various programs regarding EUA drugs to elected officials, treating physicians, and nurses. It is manifest that meaningful context was denied to those who needed such information the most. In addition, many effective and easily accessible treatment options were actively suppressed or otherwise blocked from reaching patients in urgent need.”
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation also supports parents at the forefront of efforts against school boards who would dare use our children as pandemic-theater political props. At the same time, it challenges the heinous civil rights deprivations imposed upon these parents.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is developing a strategy white-paper to provide a safe haven for whistleblowers, that is, treating physicians and nurses willing to make complete disclosures regarding how they were led astray by limiting (and even dangerous) public health agency protocols.
To this point, The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is, at an urgent pace, constructing multinational and multidisciplinary alliances to tap interested international legal, medical, and scientific expertise in the expansion of its global offensive and defensive measures against these abuses and crimes.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is also working on various other, potentially significantly impactful legal strategies, the precise nature of which, for obvious reasons, cannot be completely elaborated upon at this time. These include, without limitation, task force investigative and law enforcement partnership efforts.
The efforts of The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation are broadly directed towards the restoration of our common humanity by re-establishing the primacy of the Bill of Rights and insisting upon the realization of, and respect for, customary international human rights.
Of course, funding is the primary limiting factor in what The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation can achieve. Our operations and goals are expansive, ambitious, and only made possible by generous contributions of all sizes and kinds.
If you would like to contribute financially, we can accept tax-deductible donations here (https://formerfedsgroup.org/donate/).
If you would like to volunteer your time to support our operations, legal, medical, or related research, writing and media, or any of a wide variety of roles, please reach out to us either personally or via our website (https://formerfedsgroup.org/volunteer/).
Announcing Structural Changes
Here are some of the changes coming up and a recap of our work within the foundation:
Our acting director, Adam Gaertner, will be resigning the position to focus energy on upcoming research projects. Adam generously stepped up to get us fledged in a time if national crisis and he has been integral to securing donations and funding our organization to do this on-the-ground work. We would like to acknowledge and express our heartfelt appreciation to Adam for helping us assemble our team, for his keen leadership, and his guiding hand in helping us evolve through this initial phase to build permanent management of this volunteer organization, led with board oversight. We wish him all the best in his new project and look forward to continuing our mutually benefical relationship where perhaps he may be able to return as soon a board member.
The Former Feds Foundation started out in 2016 with a few goals in mind: fight encroachments on our freedoms that seem to be increasing and accelerating and reestablish oversight, controls, limitations and rule of law on institutions and government so that they can once again protect human rights and Consitutional Rights.
Here are some highlights of what we have achieved in a few short months:
– Facebook suit: supported ongoing litigation against Facebook battling Big Tech censorship of advocacy of early treatments for COVID-19, opposition to mandatory vaccinations, and general questioning of the prevailing political, economic or medical narratives. As of now, it looks like Loveland et. al v. Facebook will receive approval to represent 1.5% of Facebook users who are deemed by Facebook to be “vaccine hesitant.” If you were censored over the last two years for a COVID-19 post, you may ultimately be represented in this suit.
– Motion For Detention Release based on Humanitarian violations by the Department of Corrections (DOC) in the District of Columbia alleging violations of the Nuremberg Code and the Helsinki Protocols; as the state of Constitutional protections is so marginalized post-pandemic, to avoid reaching the required decision, the District Court in that action misinterpreted the arguments made and ruled against the defendants in this case. The legal team concluded the path through the Circuit to the Supreme Court would generate bad case law given the pressures the judiciary is under at this time so it was not appealed, but it remains in a federal docket for later use. The system has been put on official notice that punishing prisoners for refusal to receive coerced medical experimentation consitutes violations of Constitutional and International Laws.
– Issued a report on US Department of Justice violations of federal principles of prosecution and false filings in the District of New Jersey and the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that were being used in the United Kingdom to strip a Chinese National single mother of her UK refugee status and deport her to a Chinese prison. Here, US government law enforcement overreach was affecting innocents in the UK, so we investigated and issued a report and presented the findings to the Crown and to the Court, who agreed with our experts, and granted her citizenship.
– Supported legal work to benefit January 6 defendants, many of whom are totally innocent, many of whom have been ensnared in the US government’s current political-based prosecution that, in important respects, alleges false crimes and strips defendants of Constitutional protections afforded under the Bill of Rights.
– Pro Se Complaint filing: We have just completed a 66-page Pro Se complaint, which is accessible to anyone that we have implemented widely and will continue to use in the fight against tyrannical vaccine and medical mandates in the workplace.
– Vaccine mandate waivers: We developed and implemented a novel approach to vaccine mandate religious waivers around a Crimes Against Humanity foundation to prepare the Nation and we toppled opposition at some of the largest “Fortune 500” companies in the world; this has enabled hundreds of people to keep their careers.
– Awareness campaigns: Our organization has mounted numerous live streams, infographics, and channels on social media to make the public aware of early treatment possibilities, potential liabilities with remdesivir, and legal remedies related to vaccine mandates. In addition to this, we plan on continuing campaigns for public awareness and more resources individuals can use in this continuing fight.
– Remdesivir and Medical Liability suits: We are in the midst of our struggle for justice for the many thousands of victims of murderous hospital protocols which forced upon them intubation and the toxic Remdesivir against their consent. Please contact us if you or a loved one has been affected by remdesivir.
– Soon to announce coordination of program under leadership by leading luminaries in the medical freedom movement to protect treating physicians and treating nurses who wish to make full disclosures about the negative effects on patient health form having relied on unconscionable government treatment protocols.
With your greatly valued moral and material support we will continue this war energetically, effectively, and fearlessly.
The Supreme Court Rules on Vaccine Mandates
The Supreme Court (SCOTUS) has issued opinions regarding the CMS and OSHA vaccine mandates, within less than a week of hearing the final arguments. SCOTUS has blocked OSHA’s vaccine mandate for companies of over one hundred employees, but has upheld the CMS vaccine mandate for all healthcare workers.
OSHA’s mandate came to the Supreme Court via the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. That court had ruled that the Biden Administration could enforce the rule that would have required eligible staff to either get the COVID-19 vaccine, or to submit to weekly testing. Their decision was based on the premise that there was sufficient authority granted by Congress to the agency to institute these requirements. The Supreme Court decided that there was not. The court compared COVID to day-to-day illnesses and pollution hazards; they did not want OSHA to regulate those hazards of daily life, and would have had to expand OSHA’s regulatory authority if they had allowed this mandate to stand. The dissent, by Justice Breyer, argued the virus was not a regular daily hazard, but an “unparalleled threat” to our nation’s workers. The court’s action blocks the enforcement of the OSHA mandate rule, and litigation continues in the lower courts.
On the other hand, CMS’s vaccine mandate was upheld by SCOTUS for all health care workers. On November 4th, CMS issued an emergency regulation requiring all health care workers to participate in Medicare and Medicaid’s rule to be fully vaccinated. The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled, on December 15th, that it was inappropriate for a lower court to block the mandate nationwide, keeping it in place for just over half the country. The court concluded that the CMS rule was within the powers that Congress had conferred on the agency. This allows conditions to be put on Medicaid and Medicare funds. The court wrote that they were seeking to ensure that transmission of the virus would stop between healthcare workers. They concluded that this mandate is consistent with the fundamental principles of the medical industry and motto: “First, do no harm.” The CMS vaccine mandate for healthcare workers is back in effect nationwide; however, it is still blocked by the state of Texas. Healthcare workers have a deadline of February 28th to be fully vaccinated in order to comply with the mandate.
OSHA’s rule was blocked by a 6-3 majority opinion, and the CMS vaccine rule was upheld by a 5-4 majority opinion.
The FormerFeds Freedom Foundation has been preparing for this moment. We are making available consultations for legal direction amidst a broadly integrative strategy aimed toward the cessation of all pandemic related mandates.
If you are facing any manner of mandate, please contact us ASAP for help.
The FormerFeds Freedom Foundation is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization. We stand ready to help Americans of all stripes stand up against tyranny and abuse of our constitutional rights and freedoms.
FDA Death Protocol: Interviews with Survivors and Families Of Victims
December 12, 2021 – The FDA Death Protocol including remdesivir is responsible for the unnecessary suffering of countless victims and their families. Last month, the FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation formed a weekly support group, to help comfort and organize surviving victims and families of victims who have been impacted by unscrupulous policies incentivizing hospitals to administer the ineffective and sometimes lethal FDA Death Protocol including remdesivir. Word quickly spread about The Remdesivir Survivors and Victims Support Group and Action Committee, and our inbox was flooded with requests to participate in the support group meetings. When some victims expressed a desire to go public with their stories and explained how they had been censored by social media, we knew we had to start documenting their experiences, to give them support closure, to make this sad state of affairs known in an effort to spare further suffering, and to archive their testimonies for the record.
The surviving victims and families of victims of the FDA Death Protocol come to our meetings still reeling from the experience of having been abused and mistreated at the hands of those they had entrusted with their health. Invariably, we hear them express a range of emotions: shock, horror, confusion, bewilderment, terror, sadness, and devastation. Bubbling beneath the surface of these feelings of grief and betrayal, we invariably sense a growing sense of outrage. People are mad. They want to tell their stories and commiserate with their peers, but they find that when they try, they are censored and silenced on social media. This only fuels their rage. Until recently, our society has always allowed people to process their grief. “Why can’t these stories be told?” they demand to know.
Why can’t these stories be told?
Big Tech has a stranglehold on our civic discourse, but since their agents are cowards, they tend to target individuals who they presume cannot defend themselves. It takes an organization such as ours, with an army of lawyers and legions of patriots behind us, to penetrate the membrane of the propaganda and censorship bubble and provide a shield around individuals who would otherwise be silenced. Despite our public and outspoken stand, we retain our social media platforms, because to deplatform us would be to trigger a domino-like Streisand effect, serving to amplify our message exponentially. Our enemies do not want to martyr The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is effectively standing sentinel over the victims of the protocols and policies we abhor, holding the line so that these brave people can finally speak and be heard, and their stories be told. Only once the victims and their families are able to share their experience are they finally able to process their grief, knowing they have honored the memory of their loved one or spared another person having to go through a similar experience. We find it reprehensible that social media companies are suppressing these stories and further victimizing the survivors of these crimes against humanity, and we will continue to document, share, and archive their experiences until every victim has has enjoyed the opportunity to be heard.
Listen to these incredible stories on our YouTube channel.
The Remdesivir Survivors and Victims Support Group and Action Committee
Monday Nights at 9pm Eastern
November 3, 2021 – The drug remdesivir or Veklury, sold by Gilead Sciences, has become the standard of care for most hospitals nationwide, regardless of the many safety concerns and adverse effects that it has shown in thousands of patients. The drug is supposed to be an anti-viral but is turning out to be more like an anti-kidney drug afterall. The treatment is usually 5 days and cost $3100 and up. Not to mention, under the CTAP program, hospitals are being financially incentivized for administering RMV to patients. By law, since RMV is unapproved and issued under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA), the provider is required to go over the drug’s fact sheet with the patient or patient’s advocate and give them a choice whether they want to receive it or not. Since RMV has not gone through the regular safety testing or enough studies to show a definite efficacy against COVID-19, having a choice is imperative to the patients’ rights to protect his or her health. There have been clear complications with RMV, some being minor, but most have been major side effects, and many have been fatal. RMV has shown over and over to cause liver and kidney failure, sepsis, multiorgan failure, cardiac arrest, among others. What we are seeing, is that patients’ rights are being overlooked and they are not given the fact sheet, told of the risks associated with RMV or been able to give consent on whether they choose to receive this experimental treatment. Hospitals are just treating patients with it without advising the patient or their family even when the patient or their caregiver explicitly states they do not want RMV in their treatment protocol. Hospitals are often misusing it and giving it to patients at the wrong time in the illness or when the patient already has a history of elevated liver enzymes or kidney issues, which is stated specifically in the provider’s fact sheet, do not use in that situation.
The Former Feds Freedom Foundation is currently investigating remdesivir and the deadly results it has had on many patients. We have a support group meeting every Monday where victims of RMV’s loved ones call in and tell their story. It’s almost always the same, heartbreaking, and consistent in states throughout the nation. “The patient or their family requests Ivermectin, gets denied by hospital administration, pushed into, or often not even told they are going to use RMV, patient worsens, they have to get vented and then they die of renal failure, pulmonary edema, sepsis, liver failure, multi-organ failure and cardiac arrest. It’s the same story over and over and over. “
If you have personally survived a death match with remdesivir or if you have a loved one who has been subjected to the FDA Death Protocol including remdesivir, please join us this Monday at 9:00 pm for a video conference by sending an email to: FDAdeathProtocol@FormerFedsGroup.Org. Meet others who understand what you have been through. We are devising strategies to prevent any more people from being victimized by this terrible drug and also ensuring that there is accountability for the harm caused by this drug.
We will share common experiences and continue to devise strategies to protect unnecessary victims of this terrible drug by informing and educating others about how to avoid getting trapped into poisoning their bodies with this killer drug. You can not trust hospitals in this regard. The protocols they are incentivized to use will kill you. See Victim Witness Accounts of Crimes Against Humanity here.
Jennifer Bridges Joins the FormerFedsGroup Team
March 15, 2022, as of the 15th of March, Registered Nurse Jennifer Bridges has joined the FormerFedsGroup 501c3 team as a Director and Medical Consultant.
Jennifer brings nine years of medical experience and has been on the front lines of the Covid19 pandemic. She worked for Houston Methodist Hospital until the hospital forced their employees to take the experimental vaccine, which she refused. Jennifer has a filed a state and federal lawsuit and her case has reached the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is excited to have Jennifer’s experience and passion for fighting vaccine mandates which will help to further our multinational alliance to combat pandemic abuses & mandates via every available legal route.
First and foremost, The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is making available consultations for legal direction amidst a broadly integrative strategy aimed toward cessation of all pandemic-related mandates. If you are facing any manner of mandate, please reach out to us ASAP for help. The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is also pursuing a broad range of highly impactful initiatives to act against the pandemic abuses and crimes being wantonly committed across our world today.
Many of our initiatives cannot be publicly disclosed, for a variety of reasons. The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is able to disclose some:
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is providing support for a number of leading independent initiatives to prevent mandated EUA medical experimentation, and to seek remediation against improperly provided or waived informed consent.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is supporting parents, at the forefront of efforts against school boards that are effectively using our children as pandemic-theater political props and combatting the heinous civil rights deprivations being imposed.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is developing a strategy whitepaper to provide safe haven for whistleblowers, to identify & market opportunities for amnesty for medical professionals blowing the whistle on crimes against humanity & to remedy the underserving of elected officials by misleading official data.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is constructing multinational alliances to tap interested international expertise, and to expand our wide-ranging host of offensive and defensive measures across the world at a breakneck a pace as The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is able to manage.
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is working on a number of other, potentially very highly impactful legal strategies that unfortunately cannot be disclosed at this time, which variously include task force investigative & law enforcement partnership efforts.
Our efforts are incredibly broad, and pursuant to nothing less than the furtherance of all humanity, in all corners of the world The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is able to reach. Our efforts for the cause rely heavily on two invaluable resources: volunteers and donations.
Funding is always a limiting factor in what The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation is able to achieve. Our operations and goals are expansive, ambitious, and only made possible by generous donations of all sizes. If you would like to contribute, we can accept tax-deductible donations here:
If you would like to volunteer your time to support our operations, legal, medical, or related research, writing and media, or any of a number of other roles, please reach out to us either personally or via the website contact form.
