Forcing Hospitals To Treat Patients

It is practically incomprehensible that one would need to engage the court system to avail COVID patients of treatment, but this is simply the reality of the present world we live in. Hospitals refuse to administer early treatment, or often any effective treatment at all; they adhere slavishly, blind to every manifest need of their sick and dying patients, to irrational and harmful FDA and CDC guidance. This guidance discourages the utilization of off-label drugs for COVID-19 in favor of sending COVID patients home to get “lots of rest” and “drink plenty of fluids” until they become sick enough to be admitted to the ICU. This guidance effectively provides that, when the patient arrives at the ICU, they are immediately given Remdesivir, a drug proven useless at that stage of the illness and very likely toxic. Remdesivir causes the patient’s health to deteroriate and usually results in the patient having to be vented, which most of the time means…left to die. In New York alone, hospitals became “murder factories” where eighty percent of COVID patients who were placed on ventilators, many without any necessity other than the benefit to the hospital’s “bottom line”, ultimately died.

For any other disease, the prevailing wisdom has always placed an emphasis on early intervention and prevention. For COVID-19, even the idea of early treatment and prophylaxis has been effectively criminalized by corrupt public health agencies, the mainstream media, and social media counterparts. The public health agencies answer only to large pharmaceutical companies who have captured them, and the media answer only to those same entities, who pay them via advertising or even direct bribes to reporters. Simply suggesting that COVID patients avail themselves of early treatment is enough to get one permanently suspended from social media platforms, while mainstream news outlets act as spokespeople for Big Pharma, relentlessly mocking and deriding anyone who dares suggest that early treatment and prophylaxis work to save lives. Unfortunately, common sense is losing this fight. We intend to remind people what they already know…prevention and early treatment is the best course of action with all diseases, Covid is not an exception. 

Members of the FormerFeds Freedom Foundation have, previous to joining us, litigated in court, often pro bono or at an extremely reduced rate, to obligate hospitals to provide COVID patients effective treatments such as Ivermectin and to save the patients from Remdesivir and mechanical ventilation. The FormerFeds Freedom Foundation is now developing partnerships to utilize legal channels to force hospitals to properly treat patients, and in tandem is developing a national strategy to permanently stop the use of ineffective protocols involving Remdesivir and ventilators.

Were You Or A Loved One Denied Treatment?

If you or someone you love has been or is currently being denied treatment for COVID-19, please contact us immediately. No one should have to take on the corrupt medical establishment alone.

Would You Like To Help Fight Against Medical Tyranny?

There are thousands of people who have been impacted by these abysmal policies, and their voices are being suppressed. If you would like to help document and archive stories from COVID victims and their families, please volunteer to assist this effort today.

Related Articles From The FormerFedsGroup Blog

Whistleblower: NHS ordered EUTHANASIA to Inflate COVID-19 Deaths in Hospitals


The article claims that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients in order to artificially inflate the number of COVID-19 deaths. The information is based on the testimony of an anonymous whistleblower referred to as Dr. John. The whistleblower alleges that NHS executives falsified data by directing medical staff to provide minimal treatment to patients and by instructing them on how to put patients to sleep using the drug midazolam and the End of Life Care program.

The article suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic did not overwhelm NHS hospitals, contrary to what authorities and the mainstream media reported. It highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, and alleges that the British government authorized the “mass murder” of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection, blaming COVID-19 instead.

The article cites a report from the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) that allegedly supports the whistleblower’s claims. The report states that 34% of NHS employees were forced to give Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders to COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties. It emphasizes that DNR decisions should be made on an individual basis and not dictated by blanket policies.

The whistleblower, Dr. John, points out neglectful policies in hospitals, resulting in worse outcomes for patients. He shares personal experiences of patients delaying hospital visits due to fear of COVID-19, leading to increased pain and suffering. He also mentions instances of patients removing casts themselves and lack of proper follow-up care, causing distress to patients and their families.

The article attempts to manipulate readers by using strong language, such as “mass murder” and “blanket policies,” to create a sense of outrage. It relies heavily on the anonymous testimony of Dr. John without providing additional evidence or corroboration. The article also emphasizes the negative aspects of the NHS and British government while downplaying any potential challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overall, the article presents a one-sided and sensationalized narrative, making strong claims without sufficient evidence. It is important to approach such articles with caution and seek additional credible sources to verify the information presented.

Read More

RFK Knows

The given excerpt is not an article or text, but rather a notice from Twitter, indicating that JavaScript needs to be enabled in order to use the website. As such, there are no main points to summarize, as the content is purely technical in nature and does not contain any information or arguments to analyze.

Read More