Vaccine Mandates – Get Your Day In Federal Court
We are witnessing, world-wide, coordinated efforts to impose vaccinations upon individuals who, for a variety of reasons, have determined that they do not wish to be vaccinated.
Those individuals who have determined that they do not wish to be vaccinated have begun to unite, and are utilizing various methods, all of which overlap to some degree, to resist the imposition of the vaccinations. Some are protesting, via social media or via demonstrations. Others have taken recourse to the political realm to resist. Still others have begun to seek legal recourse against the efforts to mandate vaccinations.
All of these methods to resist the imposition of the vaccines have come up against certain roadblocks which, at first glance, might seem almost insurmountable. Those who would protest via social media are often blocked from doing so by those social media giants who, influenced by those who favor forced vaccinations, would censor those who would oppose the vaccine mandates.
Those who would take to the street to demonstrate are often blocked by restrictions set by their own governments which, influenced by those who favor forced vaccinations, would prohibit those who would oppose the vaccine mandates from exercising their rights to lawful assembly. Those who would take to the streets in lawful protest also face the obstacles set by a mainstream media (whose salary is paid by many of those who would benefit from the imposition of the vaccine mandates) which fails to provide coverage of such protests, thus limiting their impact on the public opinion. None of these obstacles are entirely insurmountable, but merely require the development, and execution, of creative and unique strategies to overcome them. Those who have begun to seek legal recourse against the efforts to mandate vaccinations have also faced certain roadblocks which, at first glance, might also seem insurmountable.
The legal system is complex and, to a layman, might seem nearly incomprehensible and intimidating, as the engine of a car would appear impossibly complex and intimidating to anyone other than a mechanic. Hiring an attorney is an expensive endeavor, and even for those with the financial ability to hire an attorney, it is difficult to find an attorney willing to assist them in such a newly developing area of the law, where there are no templates available from previous litigation matters, requiring attorneys to devise their papers from “scratch”, when most attorneys are far more comfortable (and, thus, more willing to engage) in matters of the type that they have been specializing in for years.
Again, none of these obstacles to seeking legal recourse against the efforts to mandate vaccinations are entirely insurmountable, but merely require the development, and execution, of creative and unique strategies to overcome them.
And the Former Feds Freedom Foundation has developed such a strategy.
We have prepared a free, easy to use, fill in the blank Complaint and Emergency Order to Show Cause that will permit a brave individual, with or without an attorney, to get their day in Federal Court to protest any vaccine mandate, whether imposed on that individual by their employer, their university, their child’s school, or an entity that refuses to deal with them unless they are vaccinated. We have on our team (ready and willing [any time of the day, and any day of the week other than sundown Friday to sundown Saturday] to patiently coach such a brave individual to engage in such an endeavor) a graduate of Harvard College and Harvard Law School, who has been engaged in the law on three separate continents and was selected by undergraduate students as the Best Teaching Fellow at Harvard in the early 1990’s.
And we expect our carefully selected team to grow rapidly.
What we need from the public is a supply of such brave individuals, no legal experience necessary, who are ready and willing (with our coaching assistance) to overcome their fear (a fear that those who would impose mandates on us have exploited to the full during this pandemic) to “get their day” in a Federal Court and explain to a judge, in the defense of themselves, their families, and so many others, why the court should use the power invested in it to oppose a particular vaccine mandate. With enough such brave individuals, the vaccine mandates as a whole will have to fail. Remember, our opponents have all the money (and fear) in the world, but we have all the People in the world. The Former Feds Freedom Foundation, we believe, has found the strategy to take advantage of that resource, which we consider practically inexhaustible and, quite frankly, unstoppable.
Ready For Your Day In Court?
If you are ready to take a stand against vaccine mandates, you are one of the brave individuals we are looking for, and we want to hear from you.
Please contact us and speak with one of our agents about what you can do to assert your rights on behalf of your family, your community, your country, and the free world.
Would You Rather Volunteer?
We understand that not everyone will be eager to stand up in court and take on the system, but there are many ways that you can help with this effort. Will you stand with us and volunteer a few hours of your time to assist with this monumental task?
Together we can make a difference.
Related Articles From The FormerFedsGroup Blog
The article claims that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients in order to artificially inflate the number of COVID-19 deaths. The information is based on the testimony of an anonymous whistleblower referred to as Dr. John. The whistleblower alleges that NHS executives falsified data by directing medical staff to provide minimal treatment to patients and by instructing them on how to put patients to sleep using the drug midazolam and the End of Life Care program.
The article suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic did not overwhelm NHS hospitals, contrary to what authorities and the mainstream media reported. It highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, and alleges that the British government authorized the “mass murder” of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection, blaming COVID-19 instead.
The article cites a report from the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) that allegedly supports the whistleblower’s claims. The report states that 34% of NHS employees were forced to give Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders to COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties. It emphasizes that DNR decisions should be made on an individual basis and not dictated by blanket policies.
The whistleblower, Dr. John, points out neglectful policies in hospitals, resulting in worse outcomes for patients. He shares personal experiences of patients delaying hospital visits due to fear of COVID-19, leading to increased pain and suffering. He also mentions instances of patients removing casts themselves and lack of proper follow-up care, causing distress to patients and their families.
The article attempts to manipulate readers by using strong language, such as “mass murder” and “blanket policies,” to create a sense of outrage. It relies heavily on the anonymous testimony of Dr. John without providing additional evidence or corroboration. The article also emphasizes the negative aspects of the NHS and British government while downplaying any potential challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Overall, the article presents a one-sided and sensationalized narrative, making strong claims without sufficient evidence. It is important to approach such articles with caution and seek additional credible sources to verify the information presented.Read More
Human Rights Violations thru Public Private Partnerships: Episode 123 w/ Stanford Graham, Jake Lang & Friends
The video features an interview with Stanford Graham and friends, who discuss their views on...Read More
The article discusses the reputation of the pharmaceutical industry, which has been damaged by the opioid epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. The author suggests that while the industry has made life-saving drugs and vaccines widely available, it has also contributed to the declining state of American health. The article also considers ideas for reforming the industry. The author seems to be attempting to present a balanced view of the pharmaceutical industry, acknowledging both its benefits and flaws, while also hinting at the need for reform.Read More
Brad (Huckleberry) Seiler and his wife Gail join Stew Peters to talk about what it took to save...Read More
The doctor told Gail Seiler she was “going to die” without even examining her.Read More