Twitter: Tommy’sPodcast (@tommys_podcast)
Twitter: Tommy’sPodcast (@tommys_podcast)
The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit primarily manned by volunteers impacted by COVID-related crimes against humanity, has filed an amicus curiae brief in a landmark legal case concerning Principal Edward Lang and co-petitioners, Joseph W. Fischer and Garrett Miller. The crux of the case revolves around the interpretation of the term “corruptly” in the federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). Thomas Renz, Esq. of Renz Law, LLC, has led this legal charge, emphasizing the ambiguous nature of the statute, which could have implications on First Amendment rights. The Foundation’s brief points to potential inconsistencies in the statute’s application and its potential misuse.
Today, two people who suffered injuries from the drug Remdesivir (a/k/a “Veklury”), filed a class-action complaint against Gilead Sciences, Inc. for alleged violations of consumer protection laws, false advertising, deceptive promotion, negligent misrepresentation, and other charges related to the marketing and administration of the drug. The complaint seeks damages, injunctive relief, and disgorgement for personal injuries and wrongful death.
In a somber gathering against a backdrop marked by an unprecedented climate of censorship, the CHD...
Learn about the 25 Commonalities we’ve identified across hundreds of cases by listening to the CHD Bus Tour interview with eyewitness to crimes against humanity, COVID protocol widow Miriam Belknap.
Loved one died of Covid? Are you Sure? BREAKINGNEWS:@nataliegwinters @jsolomonReports...
Carolyn Blakeman of @FormerFeds and Nurse Laura Demaray join to discuss the upcoming Restoring Hope event in Conroe,TX benefiting Covid19 victims featuring @IvoryHecker, @FiveTimesAugust, @DrJohnWitcher and many other speakers and musicians. 8:30 pm CT.
Dr. Janci Lindsay and Carolyn Blakeman start off today’s episode of ‘An Informed Life Radio’ with...
BBC documentary that exposes how the city of New York had been forcing HIV-Positive children under its supervision to be used as human guinea pigs in tests for experimental AIDS drug trials.
The article claims that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients in order to artificially inflate the number of COVID-19 deaths. The information is based on the testimony of an anonymous whistleblower referred to as Dr. John. The whistleblower alleges that NHS executives falsified data by directing medical staff to provide minimal treatment to patients and by instructing them on how to put patients to sleep using the drug midazolam and the End of Life Care program.
The article suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic did not overwhelm NHS hospitals, contrary to what authorities and the mainstream media reported. It highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, and alleges that the British government authorized the “mass murder” of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection, blaming COVID-19 instead.
The article cites a report from the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) that allegedly supports the whistleblower’s claims. The report states that 34% of NHS employees were forced to give Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders to COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties. It emphasizes that DNR decisions should be made on an individual basis and not dictated by blanket policies.
The whistleblower, Dr. John, points out neglectful policies in hospitals, resulting in worse outcomes for patients. He shares personal experiences of patients delaying hospital visits due to fear of COVID-19, leading to increased pain and suffering. He also mentions instances of patients removing casts themselves and lack of proper follow-up care, causing distress to patients and their families.
The article attempts to manipulate readers by using strong language, such as “mass murder” and “blanket policies,” to create a sense of outrage. It relies heavily on the anonymous testimony of Dr. John without providing additional evidence or corroboration. The article also emphasizes the negative aspects of the NHS and British government while downplaying any potential challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Overall, the article presents a one-sided and sensationalized narrative, making strong claims without sufficient evidence. It is important to approach such articles with caution and seek additional credible sources to verify the information presented.