Constitutional Law Group

Current Purpose & Focus:

We are in a very dark time where many components of our government are actively working to destroy our rights under the pretense of a “global pandemic”. We are seeing a barrage of unconstitutional “lockdowns”, “Executive Orders”, rules, mandates, etc. that flagrantly infringe on our Constitutionally protected rights. We are seeing fear and chaos spreading through our nation, and our freedoms and liberties are being threatened like never before. Many a patriotic American fought and died for these rights, and we will not sit idly by and watch it happen!

We are pursuing lawful claims against multiple governors and other public servants in multiple states for acting under Color of Law. These states include California, Washington, and New Jersey. Executive Orders are not laws! No American can be subjected to threats, intimidation, or punishment for not obeying an Executive Order. No emergency power supersedes the Constitution!

If any American is threatened by a government “official” with punishments for not obeying unconstitutional and unlawful orders, that “official” is acting under “Color of Law”, and by doing so becomes personally liable for their actions. They are stripped of their “judicial immunity”, and can be sued personally.

Heroes Of The Pandemic

FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation Files Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Petitioners Lang, Fischer, and Miller in Landmark 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) Case

The FormerFedsGroup Freedom Foundation, a nonprofit primarily manned by volunteers impacted by COVID-related crimes against humanity, has filed an amicus curiae brief in a landmark legal case concerning Principal Edward Lang and co-petitioners, Joseph W. Fischer and Garrett Miller. The crux of the case revolves around the interpretation of the term “corruptly” in the federal statute 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2). Thomas Renz, Esq. of Renz Law, LLC, has led this legal charge, emphasizing the ambiguous nature of the statute, which could have implications on First Amendment rights. The Foundation’s brief points to potential inconsistencies in the statute’s application and its potential misuse.

Class Action Complaint Filed Against Gilead Sciences, Inc. Over Remdesivir Alleges False Advertising And Negligence

Today, two people who suffered injuries from the drug Remdesivir (a/k/a “Veklury”), filed a class-action complaint against Gilead Sciences, Inc. for alleged violations of consumer protection laws, false advertising, deceptive promotion, negligent misrepresentation, and other charges related to the marketing and administration of the drug. The complaint seeks damages, injunctive relief, and disgorgement for personal injuries and wrongful death.

Whistleblower: NHS ordered EUTHANASIA to Inflate COVID-19 Deaths in Hospitals

Whistleblower: NHS ordered EUTHANASIA to Inflate COVID-19 Deaths in Hospitals

Summary:

The article claims that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients in order to artificially inflate the number of COVID-19 deaths. The information is based on the testimony of an anonymous whistleblower referred to as Dr. John. The whistleblower alleges that NHS executives falsified data by directing medical staff to provide minimal treatment to patients and by instructing them on how to put patients to sleep using the drug midazolam and the End of Life Care program.

The article suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic did not overwhelm NHS hospitals, contrary to what authorities and the mainstream media reported. It highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, and alleges that the British government authorized the “mass murder” of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection, blaming COVID-19 instead.

The article cites a report from the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) that allegedly supports the whistleblower’s claims. The report states that 34% of NHS employees were forced to give Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders to COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties. It emphasizes that DNR decisions should be made on an individual basis and not dictated by blanket policies.

The whistleblower, Dr. John, points out neglectful policies in hospitals, resulting in worse outcomes for patients. He shares personal experiences of patients delaying hospital visits due to fear of COVID-19, leading to increased pain and suffering. He also mentions instances of patients removing casts themselves and lack of proper follow-up care, causing distress to patients and their families.

The article attempts to manipulate readers by using strong language, such as “mass murder” and “blanket policies,” to create a sense of outrage. It relies heavily on the anonymous testimony of Dr. John without providing additional evidence or corroboration. The article also emphasizes the negative aspects of the NHS and British government while downplaying any potential challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overall, the article presents a one-sided and sensationalized narrative, making strong claims without sufficient evidence. It is important to approach such articles with caution and seek additional credible sources to verify the information presented.

Loading