Informed Consent

The FDA says “Informed consent is more than just a signature on a form, it is a process of information exchange that may include, in addition to reading and signing the informed consent document, subject recruitment materials, verbal instructions, question/answer sessions and measures of subject understanding.”

However, what we’re finding with experimental COVID-19 vaccines is that our public health agencies appear to be unconcerned with such trivialities as “informed consent”. In fact, many people around the world have been deprived of the knowledge that they are participating in a medical experiment, as that inconvenient fact is often omitted altogether.

Fact-checkers have even attempted to assert that Nuremberg conventions are not applicable to COVID-19 vaccines, because “they are not ‘experimental,'” despite the fact that long-term trial data does not exist.

COVID-19 vaccines “are not experimental,” but “real world data on the safety of COVID-19 shots for children is just weeks away.”

Not only are mRNA vaccines ‘experimental,’ there is no data supporting the use of continued mRNA boosters – Pfizer reportedly had a sample size of less than 30 people prior to getting the boosters ‘approved’. The data on the use of mRNA vaccines and perpetual boosters on children is almost non-existent, and there have been no long term studies evaluating how children injected with these mRNA cocktails now will fare in six months, still yet six years. They appear to be using us—and our children—as guinea pigs.

We hold it to be self-evident that this is wrong. We cannot allow it to continue.

Stunningly, flying in the face of the principle of informed consent, some of these vaccines were rolled out to people with blank drug information inserts. The AP, diligently performing their role as spokespeople for Big Pharma, explains away the blank inserts:

AP’S ASSESSMENT: Missing context. The paper insert states that it was intentionally left blank and that FDA-authorized fact sheets are available electronically, according to a J&J representative. This is intended to ensure vaccinators and consumers refer to the most up-to-date information about the vaccine during the FDA’s emergency use authorization, the representative said.

Read that again – the drug information inserts were intentionally left blank. Just Google it if you want the most up-to-date information, we’re told. When has this ever been acceptable in the history of FDA ‘approved’ medications? Never before in human history have the pharmaceutical companies been given a blank check to inject “all the people of the world” with a concoction rushed out at “warp speed” and mandated in the blink of an eye. And the FDA would like us to wait decades for FOIA data relating to the EUA process. What are they trying to hide?

The FormerFedsGroup is trying to find out. While we do that, we are providing resources that can help you ensure that your family, your neighborhood, your doctors and your community are aware of the nature of this experiment – the greatest scientific experiment ever carried out in human history. Once everyone is aware of how far wrong things have gone and we have their attention, we aim to unite the people under a common banner, and put an end to The Great Experiment. After that, we must hold those who have perpetuated this evil to account.

Malicious and powerful forces can append their lies to the truth, but where the people are informed, they will see through it, and set things right.




Read More About Informed Consent And How The Principle Is Being Violated On Our Blog

Whistleblower: NHS ordered EUTHANASIA to Inflate COVID-19 Deaths in Hospitals


The article claims that officials at the U.K. National Health Service (NHS) ordered medical staff to euthanize patients in order to artificially inflate the number of COVID-19 deaths. The information is based on the testimony of an anonymous whistleblower referred to as Dr. John. The whistleblower alleges that NHS executives falsified data by directing medical staff to provide minimal treatment to patients and by instructing them on how to put patients to sleep using the drug midazolam and the End of Life Care program.

The article suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic did not overwhelm NHS hospitals, contrary to what authorities and the mainstream media reported. It highlights the negative impact of changes in care policies, leading to patients not receiving proper follow-up care, and alleges that the British government authorized the “mass murder” of the elderly and vulnerable by midazolam injection, blaming COVID-19 instead.

The article cites a report from the U.K. Care Quality Commission (CQC) that allegedly supports the whistleblower’s claims. The report states that 34% of NHS employees were forced to give Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders to COVID-19 patients with disabilities and learning difficulties. It emphasizes that DNR decisions should be made on an individual basis and not dictated by blanket policies.

The whistleblower, Dr. John, points out neglectful policies in hospitals, resulting in worse outcomes for patients. He shares personal experiences of patients delaying hospital visits due to fear of COVID-19, leading to increased pain and suffering. He also mentions instances of patients removing casts themselves and lack of proper follow-up care, causing distress to patients and their families.

The article attempts to manipulate readers by using strong language, such as “mass murder” and “blanket policies,” to create a sense of outrage. It relies heavily on the anonymous testimony of Dr. John without providing additional evidence or corroboration. The article also emphasizes the negative aspects of the NHS and British government while downplaying any potential challenges faced during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Overall, the article presents a one-sided and sensationalized narrative, making strong claims without sufficient evidence. It is important to approach such articles with caution and seek additional credible sources to verify the information presented.

Read More

RFK Knows

The given excerpt is not an article or text, but rather a notice from Twitter, indicating that JavaScript needs to be enabled in order to use the website. As such, there are no main points to summarize, as the content is purely technical in nature and does not contain any information or arguments to analyze.

Read More