A Letter to Dr Andrew Hill

[dss_post_excerpt _builder_version="4.16" _module_preset="default" excerpt_text_align="center" excerpt_font_size="18px" text_orientation="center" global_colors_info="{}"][/dss_post_excerpt]

From Dr Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD​

March 16, 2022

Launch of our brand new documentary, in which Dr Lawrie asks Dr Hill what influenced him to change his mind about Ivermectin so unexpectedly.

Click here to view:




In October 2020 Dr Andrew Hill was tasked to report to the World Health Organisation on the dozens of new studies from around the world suggesting that Ivermectin could be a remarkably safe and effective treatment for COVID-19.

But on January 18th 2021, Dr Hill published his findings on a pre-print server. His methods lacked rigour, the review was low-quality and the extremely
positive findings on ivermectin were contradicted by the conclusion. In the end, Dr Hill advised that “Ivermectin should be validated in larger appropriately controlled randomized trials before the results are sufficient for review by regulatory authorities.”

The researcher seeking a global recommendation on Ivermectin had instead recommended against it. What were his reasons for doing so? Were his conclusions justified? Or were external forces influencing his about-face?
One year on, this film recalls exactly what happened from the perspective of somebody that experienced it first hand; Dr Tess Lawrie; also featuring contributions from Dr Pierre Kory and Dr Paul Marik who worked closely with Dr Hill during the same time frame.

This is the documentary referred to in Dr Tess Lawrie’s interview with Del Bigtree on The Highwire on Thursday, 3rd March 2022.

With thanks to Oracle Films for their fabulous production.

Read More from Dr Tess Lawrie, MBBCh, PhD​ on Substack